Unconstitutional Caps
by James Sokolove on Mar.03, 2010
I’ve written before about a number of initiatives around the country to put caps on medical malpractice awards, and why such initiatives don’t make much sense for consumers.
When last we left these proposals, the Illinois Supreme Court had delayed issuing a ruling on whether the caps were constitutional in that state. In February, the court issued its ruling overturning the state’s medical malpractice law and holding that caps on liability damages were unconstitutional.
Essentially, the Court’s decision reverses a 2005 state law capping non-economic damages—such as pain and suffering—for physicians at $500,000 and hospitals at $1 million.
The Court based its decision on a case that arose from Cook County, LeBron v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital, involving the severe disability of a young girl, Abigaile Lebron.
The New York Times had a nice write up on the ruling here.
I’ve argued ad nauseum that caps on medical malpractice do not make any sense. As I said back in December:
“The bottom line is this: Damages compensate victims who have suffered because of someone else’s negligence, but they also force the system to be careful. Doctors are more careful because they don’t want to get sued. I think that’s a good thing. Careful doctors are better doctors. Our medical system has become better because of medical malpractice law, not in spite of it.”
Kudos to the Illinois Supreme Court for a sound decision. Here’s hoping other states follow their lead.

March 3rd, 2010 on 12:35 PM
This is good to know. I had no idea. Thanks.