<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Access To Justice &#187; Product Liability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/tag/product-liability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog</link>
	<description>Powered by Sokolove Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:22:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bill to Help Consumers Sue Foreign Manufacturers for Defective Products</title>
		<link>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/29/bill-to-help-consumers-sue-foreign-manufacturers-for-defective-products/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/29/bill-to-help-consumers-sue-foreign-manufacturers-for-defective-products/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sokolove Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury Law News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defective Products]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/?p=2850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Consumers may soon be able to take foreign manufacturers of defective or dangerous products to court in the US. A House Panel this week approved the Foreign Manufacturer Legal Accountability Act, which will hold overseas manufacturers legally accountable for injuries in the same way that American manufacturers are held accountable. The legislation was filed in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/29/bill-to-help-consumers-sue-foreign-manufacturers-for-defective-products/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Class Action Alleges Apple&#8217;s Hot iPad Overheats</title>
		<link>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/28/class-action-alleges-apples-hot-ipad-overheats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/28/class-action-alleges-apples-hot-ipad-overheats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sokolove Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury Law News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/?p=2813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
The iPad may be the hottest device  around – but Apple’s latest gadget can’t take the heat. That’s the claim at the heart of a class action filed in federal court by some iPad users. The lawsuit alleges the iPad overheats rapidly when it comes in contact with sunlight or warm air. Apple faces several [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/28/class-action-alleges-apples-hot-ipad-overheats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>San Francisco Cellphone Law Challenged by CTIA</title>
		<link>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/27/san-francisco-cellphone-law-challenged-by-ctia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/27/san-francisco-cellphone-law-challenged-by-ctia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sokolove Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury Law News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/?p=2765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
The City of San Francisco is being sued over its controversial cellphone law by the CTIA, a wireless trade group. The new law requires cellphone retailers to post data about a device’s &#8220;specific absorption rate,&#8221; the radiation absorbed by a user&#8217;s body tissue. The CTIA is concerned the law could mislead consumers about the safety [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/27/san-francisco-cellphone-law-challenged-by-ctia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fuel Leakage Sparks Nissan Cube Recall</title>
		<link>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/26/fuel-leakage-sparks-nissan-cube-recall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/26/fuel-leakage-sparks-nissan-cube-recall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sokolove Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury Law News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Car Recalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nissan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/?p=2735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Nissan is voluntarily recalling 46,000 of its 2009 and 2010 Cube hatchbacks due to potential problems with fuel spilling during rear end collisions.
Learn More
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/26/fuel-leakage-sparks-nissan-cube-recall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nap Nanny Baby Recliners Recalled After Infant Death</title>
		<link>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/26/nap-nanny-baby-recliners-recalled-after-infant-death/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/26/nap-nanny-baby-recliners-recalled-after-infant-death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sokolove Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury Law News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children's products]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/?p=2727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Around 30,000 Nap Nanny portable baby recliners are being recalled by Baby Matters LLC after an infant died in one that was being used in a crib. The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is investigating the report and says it has received reports of 22 other incidents in which infants have fallen over the recliner’s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/26/nap-nanny-baby-recliners-recalled-after-infant-death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical Devices Send 70,000 Kids to ER Annually</title>
		<link>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/26/medical-devices-send-70000-kids-to-er-annually/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/26/medical-devices-send-70000-kids-to-er-annually/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sokolove Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury Law News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Devices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/?p=2718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Injuries and complications from contact lenses, ear tubes, and other types of medical devices cause more than 70,000 children to end up in the emergency room annually, according to a new Food and Drug Administration (FDA) survey. The FDA is researching how the injuries occurred and those findings could eventually result in device warnings.
Learn More
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/26/medical-devices-send-70000-kids-to-er-annually/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law Firms Double Team Banner Supply on Chinese Drywall Class Action</title>
		<link>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/23/law-firms-double-team-banner-supply-on-chinese-drywall-class-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/23/law-firms-double-team-banner-supply-on-chinese-drywall-class-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 06:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sokolove Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury Law News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Drywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defective Products]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/?p=2657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Banner Supply is the target of a statewide class action lawsuit filed by two Florida law firms that seek to consolidate thousands of Chinese drywall claims against the Miami company, according to the Miami Herald.
The lawsuit alleges that Banner Supply, which sold defective Chinese drywall to builders around the state, knew in 2006 about potential [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/23/law-firms-double-team-banner-supply-on-chinese-drywall-class-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feds Announce Drop-side Crib Ban Even as Pottery Barn Issues Crib Recall</title>
		<link>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/15/feds-announce-drop-side-crib-ban-even-as-pottery-barn-issues-crib-recall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/15/feds-announce-drop-side-crib-ban-even-as-pottery-barn-issues-crib-recall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sokolove Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury Law News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crib Ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crib recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drop-side Cribs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/?p=2639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Drop-side cribs have been banned by the Consumer Product Safety Commission as the federal agency seeks to strengthen crib safety standards for the first time in nearly 30 years, according to Bloomberg News.
The CSPC’s action came as it announced yet another crib recall, this one involving 82,000 Pottery Barn Kids drop-side cribs. The CPSC said [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/15/feds-announce-drop-side-crib-ban-even-as-pottery-barn-issues-crib-recall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suit against Apple, AT&amp;T Wins Class Action Status</title>
		<link>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/13/suit-against-apple-att-wins-class-action-status/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/13/suit-against-apple-att-wins-class-action-status/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sokolove Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury Law News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/?p=2588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Is Apple is losing some of its shine? First, consumers unhappy with the company’s response to the “death grip” reception problem plaguing its 4G iPhone have filed several class action suits demanding that Apple either provide owners with working phones or the case that the company claims will fix the problem.
Now, a federal judge has [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/13/suit-against-apple-att-wins-class-action-status/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ConAgra Loses a Round in Diacetyl Popcorn Suit</title>
		<link>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/06/conagra-loses-a-round-in-diacetyl-popcorn-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/06/conagra-loses-a-round-in-diacetyl-popcorn-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 15:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sokolove Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury Law News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diacetyl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popcorn Lung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/?p=2472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
ConAgra Foods has lost its battle to win dismissal of a pending class action alleging that the company still uses diacetyl in its microwave popcorn despite marketing claims that it does not, reports Law 360 (subscription required).
Judge S. James Otero found that the lawsuit clearly established a case or controversy and thus can move to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sokolovelaw.com/blog/2010/07/06/conagra-loses-a-round-in-diacetyl-popcorn-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
