Bard® PowerPort™ Lawsuit

Bard® PowerPort devices are implanted under the skin to deliver medicine into the bloodstream. Hundreds of patients, however, have filed Bard PowerPort lawsuits claiming they suffered injuries from their device breaking apart or moving after implantation.

At Sokolove Law, we have decades of experience standing up to large manufacturers, and we've recovered over $9.6 Billion total for clients across the country. Call (800) 995-1212 now for a free case review.

Get a Free Legal Case Review

What Is the Bard PowerPort Catheter Lawsuit?

The Bard PowerPort system is a group of implantable port devices inserted below the skin and connected to a catheter to deliver medication and fluids directly into the bloodstream.

However, Bard PowerPort lawsuits have been filed by a number of patients across the country who allege they suffered injuries from their device breaking down or moving after implantation.

Examples of alleged issues with implantable ports include: 

  • Catheter Fracture: If the catheter breaks within the veins, pieces of the catheter may travel throughout the body and cause internal damage. Patients may undergo surgery to remove pieces of the catheter.
  • Catheter Migration: If part of the catheter moves or becomes dislodged, it may lead to catheter failure or other injuries.
  • Infections: Over time, the catheter may begin to break down. Small cracks that form on the device can allow bacteria and other pathogens to enter the body.

While all implantable ports may come with some risks, Bard PowerPort lawsuits claim that specific design elements in the devices may actually increase the likelihood of complications.

At Sokolove Law, we’re dedicated to helping injured patients seek compensation from a Bard port-a-cath lawsuit to assist with medical bills, lost wages, and more.

Contact us now to see if we may be able to fight for the compensation you deserve. It costs nothing to speak with us.

Devices in the Port-a-Cath Lawsuit

Port-a-cath lawsuits claim Bard, AngioDynamics, and Navilyst received multiple adverse event reports (AERs) that highlighted the dangers of their implantable ports — but they failed to adequately warn patients about the potential risks.

Devices named in port-a-cath lawsuits include: 

  • AngioDynamics BioFlo® Port
  • AngioDynamics SmartPort® CT Titanium Port
  • ​​AngioDynamics Vortex® Port
  • ​​AngioDynamics Xcela® Plus Port
  • Bard PowerPort™ ClearVUE Implantable Port
  • Bard PowerPort™ ClearVUE ISP Implantable Port
  • Bard PowerPort™ ClearVUE Slim Implantable Port
  • Bard PowerPort™ isp M.R.I. Implantable Port
  • Bard PowerPort™ M.R.I. Implantable Port

However, Bard PowerPort devices and other port-a-caths remain approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

If you're unsure which implantable port was used in your treatment, we can help you figure it out. Even if your device isn't listed above, our experienced Bard Powerport attorneys may still be able to help you pursue justice for your injuries.

Let Us Fight for You

At Sokolove Law, we've helped thousands of clients hold powerful companies accountable. Take the first steps toward justice now.

Get a Free Case Review

Who Can File a Bard Chemo Port Lawsuit?

Eligibility to file a Bard chemo port lawsuit ultimately revolves around the device you have implanted, the nature of the injury you suffered, and your lawyer’s ability to tie the injury to the device.

You may be able to file a Bard chemo port lawsuit if you or a loved one:

  • Have an implantable port like those in the Bard PowerPort family
  • Later experienced an injury related to the device

There are no upfront costs or hourly fees to work with our Bard PowerPort lawyers, ensuring that anyone with a case can pursue justice, regardless of their financial situation.

Call (800) 995-1212 now to see if you may qualify for compensation from a chemo port lawsuit. It costs nothing to speak with us.

Injuries from Bard PowerPort Complications

If an implantable port breaks down or becomes dislodged, serious harm may follow. If you have a Bard PowerPort device and suffered any of the following injuries, you may be able to file a lawsuit and pursue compensation:

  • Cardiac punctures
  • Hematomas
  • Hemorrhage
  • Infections
  • Lacerated blood vessels
  • Necrosis (death of body tissue)
  • Organ or tissue perforation
  • Pericardial tamponade (pressure on the heart)
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Sepsis
  • Thromboembolism (blood clots)

If you were injured through no fault of your own, you shouldn’t be further burdened with expensive medical bills. Let us help you get the compensation you deserve.

Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Update 2024

As of December 2024, hundreds of Bard Powerport lawsuits have been consolidated into a multidistrict litigation (MDL), which is similar to a port class action lawsuit.

Find out more about the latest port catheter lawsuit updates: 

  • Companies named in medical port lawsuits include C.R. Bard Inc., which is owned by Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD), AngioDynamics, Inc., and Navilyst Medical, Inc.
  • Some of the first Bard PowerPort lawsuits were filed in August 2022, and many of these early cases were later transferred into the Bard MDL
  • There are currently 813 port lawsuits pending in the Bard MDL and 72 chemo port lawsuits in the AngioDynamics and Navilyst MDL
  • While no Bard Powerport lawsuit settlements have been announced yet, this litigation is active and ongoing

We will continue to provide up-to-date information on legal proceedings and potential payouts as port catheter lawsuits move through the court system.

1. Bard PowerPort MDL Continues to Grow | November 1, 2024

Over the last month, nearly 200 new Bard PowerPort lawsuits were added to the MDL, bringing the total number of claims to 720.

This marks the largest monthly increase in Bard port catheter lawsuits since these cases were first consolidated in August 2023.

If you have a Bard PowerPort device that migrated, you are not alone. Contact Sokolove Law now for help seeking justice.

2. AngioDynamics Port Lawsuits Consolidated into MDL | October 7, 2024

AngioDynamics lawsuits, along with claims involving their subsidiary Navilyst, have been centralized in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. Both companies manufacture implantable ports.

Currently, more than 50 victims have come forward claiming that complications with their devices led to injuries like perforation, infections, and blood clots.

Devices named in the Navilyst and AngioDynamics lawsuits include the SmartPort CT Titanium Port, the Vortex Port, and the Xcela Plus Port.

3. Plaintiffs Can Investigate BD’s Responsibility in Bard Lawsuits | August 16, 2024

In 2017, Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD) purchased C.R. Bard, leaving many victims unsure of who their lawsuit should be filed against.

In August 2024, the judge for the Bard port catheter lawsuit ruled that victims will be allowed to investigate whether BD should be held responsible, in addition to Bard, for alleged injuries from device complications.

4. Parties Discuss First Cases to Go to Trial | July 1, 2024

Attorneys representing both sides in the Bard PowerPort lawsuit exchanged a list of 24 cases to potentially serve as the first trials in the MDL, which are known as bellwether cases.

Bellwether trials play a crucial role in helping both parties gauge the strengths and weaknesses of their arguments. The outcome of these cases also provides insight into how much Bard PowerPort lawsuit settlements may ultimately be worth.

5. Over 100 Bard Port-A-Cath Lawsuits in MDL | March 1, 2024

As of March 2024, a total of 106 claims have been consolidated in the Bard PowerPort MDL. This number is expected to climb in the coming months as additional Bard port-a-cath lawsuits are filed.

Despite concerns from defendants about the slow start of the MDL, plaintiffs believe it could eventually grow to include several thousand claims.

The judge overseeing the case shares this expectation, emphasizing that schedules for discovery and trials will proceed as planned.

6. Discovery Ongoing in Bard Port Lawsuit | November 20, 2023

The discovery phase of the Bard port lawsuit is in progress, with both sides gathering and exchanging important evidence to build their cases.

The evidence in this litigation will likely include:

  • Company documents on the design of Bard PowerPort devices
  • Interviews with expert witnesses
  • Medical records of injured plaintiffs

Because the discovery process is ongoing, victims who join the Bard litigation in the future can still have the specific details of their cases reviewed, like their individual medical histories.

7. Bard PowerPort MDL Is Established | August 8, 2023

Several Bard PowerPort lawsuits have been consolidated into a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the U.S. District Court of Arizona, which is a legal process that resembles a port catheter class action.

The first of these claims was filed individually a few months earlier, with plaintiffs alleging similar injuries involving Bard PowerPort devices. By consolidating the lawsuits, the court aims to efficiently address common legal issues across the cases.

Get the Help You Deserve

Our experienced attorneys may be able to file a Bard PowerPort lawsuit and fight for compensation on your behalf. See if you qualify now.

Get a Free Case Review Now

How to File a Bard PowerPort Catheter Lawsuit

At Sokolove Law, we understand the stress and uncertainty that can accompany an unexpected medical complication.

Our Bard PowerPort attorneys can handle every step of the legal process for you, so you can focus on your health and well-being.

If you have a case, your legal team can:

  • Verify your eligibility to take legal action during a free case review
  • Gather evidence like your medical records and testimony to build a strong case
  • File your catheter lawsuit within any statutes of limitations or state deadlines
  • Negotiate a Bard PowerPort settlement with the defendant(s)
  • Present your case in a court trial if a settlement is unable to be reached

We’re committed to holding negligent manufacturers accountable for the harm caused by their devices. Taking legal action can help you pursue justice and protect others from similar injuries linked to port catheter devices.

There seems to be no end to the number of products that medical device companies place into the stream of commerce, despite their knowledge of side effects that they hide from the consumer, putting profits ahead of people.”
– Ricky LeBlanc, Managing Attorney at Sokolove Law

Port Catheter Lawsuit Statute of Limitations

The port catheter lawsuit statutes of limitations determine how long you have to take legal action for an injury associated with a port-a-cath.

Though these laws vary by state, most places only give you 2-3 years to file a chemo port lawsuit after your injury has been discovered.

It’s important to reach out to a port catheter law firm as soon as possible. Once this deadline passes, you won’t be able to pursue compensation for your injuries again.

Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Settlement Amounts

Compensation from a Bard PowerPort lawsuit can help pay for financial burdens linked to your condition, as well as pain or suffering caused by your injury.

In any legal case, compensation may be awarded in one of two ways:

  • Bard PowerPort lawsuit settlement amounts: A Bard port settlement is an amount of money negotiated by the victim’s lawyer and agreed to by the defendant, potentially without the case going to court.
  • Verdicts from a trial in court: If a settlement isn’t reached, the case may continue to trial where both sides present their case. A judge or jury decides the outcome in the form of a verdict.

Reaching a settlement often provides families with quicker access to compensation while avoiding the uncertainty of a trial.

Call (800) 995-1212 now to find out if you may qualify. We’ll fight hard to get you everything you’re entitled to.

Determining Port Catheter Lawsuit Settlement Amounts

The amount of money you may receive from a port catheter lawsuit depends on many factors, including how the device has affected your physical, financial, and emotional well-being.

Port catheter lawsuit settlement amounts may be determined by: 

  • Any related medical bills or treatment expenses
  • Lost wages from missed work
  • The severity of your injury and its impact on your life

If your case goes to trial, a verdict could also award punitive damages. This additional compensation is meant to punish a manufacturer that has acted negligently or recklessly.

While each case is unique, we’re committed to seeking the most compensation possible for our clients, so they can move forward with their lives with a sense of peace and closure.

Our Bard PowerPort Lawyers Can Help in All 50 States

As a national product liability law firm, Sokolove Law can help families in all 50 states hold negligent manufacturers responsible for the harm they’ve caused.

Learn how our Bard PowerPort lawyers stand out from the rest: 

  • Free Legal Consultations: We provide all potential clients with a free consultation to determine whether or not they may be eligible to file a lawsuit.
  • Offices & Attorneys Nationwide: As a national law firm, Sokolove Law can help with your case wherever you may be in the United States.
  • No Financial Risk: There are no out-of-pocket or upfront costs to work with our Bard PowerPort lawyers — we only get paid if you do.
  • Decades of Experience: For over 45 years, Sokolove Law has helped clients across the country pursue justice and hold the companies responsible for their injuries accountable.
  • Track Record of Results: We’ve secured over $1.6 Billion for our clients affected by dangerous medical devices and prescription drugs.

We’re dedicated to fighting for the rights of those harmed by medical devices like the Bard PowerPort catheter. Let our PowerPort attorneys get you the money you deserve.

What Are Bard Port-a-Caths Used for?

Bard port-a-caths are implanted in the skin to provide long-term access to a patient’s veins for regular intravenous (IV) treatments.

These devices offer an efficient way to deliver medications, fluids, and other treatments while reducing discomfort and minimizing vein damage over time.

Bard port-a-caths may be used for: 

  • Blood transfusions
  • Chemotherapy
  • Collecting blood samples
  • IV contrast (dye to help organs show up on a CT scan)
  • IV fluids
  • Other medications

For cancer patients, port-a-caths can make treatments like chemotherapy more manageable by reducing the need for repeated needle sticks.

Unfortunately, lawsuits claim some medication ports may be prone to breaking down or migrating, which can cause further issues like infections.

If you or a loved one experienced issues with a port catheter during cancer treatment or any other therapy, you may be able to file a cancer port lawsuit.

Get Help Filing a Bard Cancer Port Lawsuit

​​At Sokolove Law, we know that dealing with cancer or another condition requiring an implantable port is already an incredibly difficult experience — and it can become even harder if the device cracks or dislodges, potentially leading to complications.

If you’ve been harmed, we may be able to help you file a Bard cancer port lawsuit and fight for the compensation you deserve.

We’ve already recovered more than $1.6 Billion for clients across the country who have been injured by dangerous medical devices or drugs.

At Sokolove Law, there are no upfront costs or hourly fees to work with a lawyer for port catheter lawsuits, so you can take legal action without facing any financial risk.

Call (800) 995-1212 now or fill out our contact form to get started with a free, no-obligation case review.

Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Settlement FAQs

What is the Bard PowerPort lawsuit about?

Bard PowerPort lawsuits allege that the catheter port material of certain devices may crack or break apart while still inside the body, potentially causing infections and other injuries.

If you or a loved one was injured from complications linked to a port-a-cath device, contact us now. You may be able to pursue compensation from a Bard PowerPort lawsuit.

Is there a Bard PowerPort class action lawsuit?

Over 800 claims have been consolidated in a multidistrict litigation (MDL), which is similar to a Bard PowerPort class action lawsuit, in the U.S. District Court of Arizona.

It’s not too late to join the Bard MDL. If you’ve experienced injuries linked to these devices, our team may be able to help guide you through the legal process and seek the justice you deserve.

Call (800) 995-1212 now to find out if you may be eligible for the Bard PowerPort MDL.

How much does it cost to file a Bard PowerPort lawsuit?

At Sokolove Law, there are no upfront costs or hourly fees to work with a lawyer for port catheter lawsuits.

Our attorneys work on a contingency-fee basis, which means you pay nothing unless we successfully secure compensation for you.

How much are Bard PowerPort lawsuit settlement amounts?

It’s difficult to determine Bard PowerPort lawsuit settlement amounts at this time because the litigation is still so new.

However, our attorneys are prepared to fight for the most compensation possible in your case, so you can get help paying for medical bills, lost wages, and more.

Get a free consultation now to see if you may be eligible for compensation from a Bard PowerPort lawsuit.

What is the Bard PowerPort complaint?

Bard PowerPort complaints allege that specific design elements of these devices may increase the risk of them fracturing or migrating within the body.

Some Bard PowerPort devices include ChronoFlex® catheters, which are made of polyurethane and barium sulfate. The barium sulfate may allegedly make these devices more prone to breaking down or cracking under certain conditions.

Who is the manufacturer of the devices in the port catheter lawsuit?

Bard PowerPorts have been made by Bard Access Systems, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc., which is now owned by Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD).

Additional port catheter lawsuits have also been filed against manufacturers AngioDynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical. AngioDynamics sells devices like the SmartPort CT Titanium Port, the Vortex Port, and the Xcela Plus Port.

Has there been a Bard PowerPort recall?

Bard PowerPort devices are currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and there is no active recall at this time.

In 2020, the FDA previously issued a Bard PowerPort recall for certain devices after finding that some products may have had a wrong-sized part attached to them, leading to prolonged procedures.

This recall was terminated in February 2022 and is not related to current litigation against the company.

What is the AngioDynamics port lawsuit about?

AngioDynamics port lawsuits claim the company’s implantable ports may fracture or migrate, which can lead to serious infections and injuries.

In October 2024, AngioDynamic port lawsuits were consolidated into a multidistrict litigation (MDL), and there are currently 72 claims pending in the MDL.

What are medical ports used for?

Medical ports are implanted under the skin to provide easier access to a patient’s veins. These ports are often used for blood samples, transfusions, chemotherapy treatments, IV fluids, and more.

If a medical port fractures or becomes dislodged, it may lead to serious injuries. You may be able to file a medical port lawsuit for compensation if you or a loved one has been harmed.

Call (800) 995-1212 now to find out if you qualify. It costs nothing to speak with us.

What does a Bard power port look like?

A Bard PowerPort is a small, implantable medical device designed to provide long-term access to the bloodstream. These devices typically consist of two parts:

  1. The port is a small, round, or oval shape made of metal or plastic. It’s implanted under the skin and often has a raised center (septum) that allows a needle to be easily inserted.
  2. The catheter is a thin, flexible tube attached to the port, which is threaded into a vein. This catheter delivers medication or fluids directly into the bloodstream.

The device is often used by patients undergoing chemotherapy or other long-term treatments.

What injuries are the Bard port catheter lawsuits about?

Alleged injuries mentioned in Bard port catheter lawsuits include:

  • Cardiac punctures
  • Hematomas
  • Hemorrhage
  • Infections
  • Lacerated blood vessels
  • Necrosis (death of body tissue)
  • Organ or tissue perforation
  • Pericardial tamponade (pressure on the heart)
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Sepsis
  • Thromboembolism (blood clots)

If the device becomes dislodged, surgery may also be required. The costs of medical care and lost wages from missed work can add up quickly.

Thankfully, our PowerPort lawyers may be able to fight for compensation on your behalf. Contact Sokolove Law to learn if you may have a case.

What are the TIVAD lawsuits about?

TIVAD lawsuits have been filed by patients with a TIVAD (totally implanted venous access device) who claim to have suffered harm due to the device migrating or breaking down.

TIVAD can refer to a number of different port catheter devices, including Bard PowerPort, AngioDynamics, and Navilyst port catheters.

Find out if you may be eligible to file a TIVAD lawsuit during a free case review now.

  1. Bard Peripheral Vascular. “PowerPort Implantable Port.” Retrieved from: https://www.bd.com/assets/documents/guides/user-guides/PI_PV_PowerPort-Implantable-Port-Patient-Guide_UG_EN.pdf. Accessed on December 5, 2024.
  2. BD. “Find a Product.” Retrieved from: https://www.bd.com/en-us/products-and-solutions/products?tabindex=1&publishedAt=all-dates&productCapability_fullstring=Vascular+access&s=productCapability_fullstring&s=productCategory_fullstring&s=productBrand_fullstring&productCategory_fullstring=Implantable+port+devices&productBrand_fullstring=PowerPort%E2%84%A2. Accessed on December 5, 2024.
  3. National Cancer Institute. “Port-a-cath.” Retrieved from: https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/port-a-cath. Accessed on December 5, 2024.
  4. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. "IN RE: BARD IMPLANTED PORT CATHETER PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION." Retrieved from: https://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/sites/jpml/files/MDL-3081-Transfer_Order-7-23.pdf. Accessed on December 5, 2024.
  5. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. "IN RE: ANGIODYNAMICS, INC., AND NAVILYST MEDICAL, INC., PORT CATHETER PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION." Retrieved from: https://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/sites/jpml/files/MDL-3125-Transfer_Order-9-24.pdf. Accessed on December 5, 2024.
  6. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. “Class 2 Device Recall Power Port Implantable Port.” Retrieved from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfRes/res.cfm?id=179655. Accessed on December 5, 2024.
  7. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. "MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANGIODYNAMICS SMART PORT; SMART PORT CT LOW PROFILE TITANIUM PORT SYSTEM." Retrieved from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=18348060&pc=LJT. Accessed on December 5, 2024.
  8. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. "MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NAVILYST MEDICAL, INC. XCELA; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR." Retrieved from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/detail.cfm?mdrfoi__id=18474789&pc=LJT. Accessed on December 5, 2024.