Johnson & Johnson Ordered to Pay $550 Million in Talc-Asbestos Ovarian Cancer Case

On July 12, a St. Louis jury sided with 22 female plaintiffs who claimed that Johnson & Johnson’s talc-based products caused them to develop ovarian cancer. The jury has ordered Johnson & Johnson (J&J) to pay at least $550 Million in compensatory damages. This figure does not yet include punitive damages – damages assessed for punishment – which are likely to be announced soon.

In the meantime, while jurors resume their deliberations over further damages, the 22 plaintiffs will generally be awarded an average of $25 Million each.

The collective group of women, who came from all around the U.S., sued J&J and subsidiary Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., and, in addition, a unit of Imerys SA, which supplied the talc to J&J. Prior to the trial, Imerys Talc America agreed to pay at least $5 Million to settle the claims against them.

The second phase of the trial, for the assessment of punitive damages, will start Friday, July 13.

Inside Johnson & Johnson Talc Asbestos Lawsuits

In this week’s verdict, J&J was found guilty for strict liability and negligence, and therefore responsible for all plaintiff injuries, including the death of 6 women (who were represented by their husbands and/or families in the trial).

J&J, which has of late found itself paying out large sums money in asbestos-contaminated talc cases, allegedly hid from the public certain testing data and scientific studies that suggested J&J knew of the asbestos contamination in its talc-based products, Baby Powder and Shower to Shower. It was argued that such data, which identified the presence of asbestos in the company’s talc, were subsequently sent on to a company-friendly laboratory that would produce different data to show the talc was safe.

2018 Shaping up to Be a Bad Year for J&J

On the day of the $550 Million verdict announcement, it was also reported that J&J’s stock has fallen a total of 13 percent in 2018.

Already, J&J has faced multiple million-dollar verdicts of a similar nature, losing 4 out of 5 asbestos-caused ovarian cancer cases so far. Relatedly, J&J is in the middle of other court battles alleging the same talc-based products are to blame for victims’ mesothelioma, a lethal cancer caused exclusively by asbestos. This past May, a California woman was awarded $25.7 Million in 1 such trial.

In spite of the compensatory damages assessed and the punitive damages to come, J&J spokesperson Carol Goodrich has yet to comment on the massive verdict in much detail: “While we are disappointed with this decision, the jury has further deliberations to conduct in this trial and we will reserve additional comment until the case is fully completed.” J&J still denies any asbestos-product contamination and is appealing all previous talc-asbestos verdicts.

The $550 Million verdict, announced Thursday, is the third-largest in the U.S. in 2018.

Sokolove Law Team

Contributing Authors

The Sokolove Law Content Team is made up of writers, editors, and journalists. We work with case managers and attorneys to keep site information up to date and accurate. Our site has a wealth of resources available for victims of wrongdoing and their families.

Last modified: August 11, 2020